D
espite the severance of the last
vestiges of the excesses of the Di Canio era with the departures of high
earners Foderingham and Andy Williams, the signing of Jordan Turnbull on a
season long loan, recruiting another batch of talented, highly sought after
youngsters from Liverpool, and retaining Kasim and Byrne (at least for now),
the expectations amongst Swindon supporters and local media outlets on Swindon’s
prospects for the forthcoming campaign have been overly negative.
Of course, in part, the pessimism
was logical. Swindon lost five
outstanding players in Foderingham, Stephens, Luongo, Gladwin and Louis
Thompson. The play-off defeat left many
supporters wounded, jaded, fed up with the naivety and lack of nous of the
precocious Swindon youngsters, preferring pragmatism, experience (even
seemingly for its own sake, despite Ricketts’s ineffectual spell) and graft if
this ultimately yields ‘results’. Then
there was the disappointment of Alfie Mawson opting to sign for Barnsley and
the misguided frustration of many at Swindon not rapidly investing the Luongo and
Gladwin transfer proceeds by incurring transfer fees on new players. Perhaps, more significantly, the media
restrictions imposed by the Club
– naturally irking those reporters of local
media outlets (and me for that matter), who are influential in calibrating
supporters’ pre-season expectations
– unduly tainted the local media’s views on
matters strictly football related. Indeed,
Total Swindon Sport’s Sam Morshead – the most prominent and articulate critic
of the Club’s media restrictions – in the most recent podcast of
The Washbag
(the principal Swindon Town FC blog), particularly peeved, half-jokingly
suggested that last season might prove to be a ‘well-orchestrated fluke’. I would certainly disagree with such
sentiments, but, ultimately, we shall see.
Swindon’s 4-1 drubbing (and it
was an utter drubbing in the second half) of Bradford on the opening day of the
season has shifted supporters’ expectations. Swindon’s performance, particularly defensively, was stronger than the
last season opener against Scunthorpe in which Scunthorpe missed three or four
sitters and Swindon’s defence looked vulnerable to all long, central upfield
punts.
Swindon began the match with a 4-3-3
formation with Vigouroux in goal; Nathan Thompson at right back; Branco and
Turnbull as centre backs; Ormonde-Ottewill at left back; Jordan Williams as the
holding central midfielder with Kasim and Stewart in more advanced positions
either side; and a front three (right to left) of Byrne, Hylton and Obika.
Swindon were not that bad in the
first half and Bradford were certainly not the dominant side as many reports have suggested. The
first Bradford goal was very good and did not stem from bad Swindon defending.
In the 4-3-3 formation Swindon looked okay defensively, but the formation was
adversely affecting Swindon’s passing and attacking play. Swindon were playing in straight lines and
Kasim could not influence the game in an advanced midfield role. Kasim’s the ‘Iraqi Pirlo’ and, accordingly,
needs to be played in a deep central midfield to dictate matters. Swindon’s build-up play from the back was
conservative with Vigouroux often punting the ball long because of a paucity of
passing options. This was completely
different after the break with Nathan Thompson playing as sweeper and Kasim in
the deep lying central midfield role.
After the break, Swindon played
what some have labelled a 3-5-2 formation, which is a simplification. In fact, it was a fluid 3-2-3-1-1 formation with
a back three of Branco, Thompson, Turnbull; Williams and Kasim sitting in front
with Stewart in a more advanced central position; Ormonde-Ottewill and Robert
(who came on for Hylton ten minutes into the game) pushed up on the flanks; and
Byrne playing in a free, ‘number 10’ type role with Obika as the ‘number 9’.
The change in formation coincided
with Swindon pressing Bradford high up the pitch and winning back possession
rapidly, often in advanced areas. Bradford did not have any significant spells of possession in the second
half and after about 75 minutes were spent physically.
The negative of the match from
Swindon’s perspective was the injury to Jermaine Hylton suffering a suspected
fractured collarbone, which will probably result in a two month absence. A blow for the Club given his talent and the
lack of options up front. Swindon will
sign another striker before the transfer window closes.
A brief word on each Swindon
player:
Vigouroux: A very impressive
debut. He has presence, calmness and good
distribution. His distribution is not as
good as Foderingham’s yet, but I think it might well be after 10 to 15 games. There could be a few howlers in the
interim. I was concerned how Swindon
would cope without Foderingham; I’m not any more.
Rossi-Branco: Always plays well
against Bradford and once again shackled James Hanson, who was reduced to an
unathletic, bedraggled, sweaty mess by the game’s end (I’m very glad that
Swindon’s game does not revolve around a 6’4”front man). Branco is underrated by most Swindon fans
with many unduly prejudiced by the much publicised grappling with Aden Flint. His ability on the ball has improved vastly and
he deserves more starting opportunities (although Swindon’s loan arrangement
with Liverpool will mean that Jordan Williams will be given preference ahead of
Branco if Williams is moved to centre back).
Thompson: Looked okay at
right back, but very impressive as sweeper. With Kasim he dictated Swindon’s build-up play in the second half and
played with great authority. His talents
are wasted at right back where he becomes peripheral.
Turnbull: Excellent, as
always.
Kasim: Needs a team
to be built around him which probably explains the relative lack of interest
from clubs higher up the football pyramid. As a deep lying creative midfielder he is outstanding. He dictated Swindon’s rhythm and tempo with
Thompson in the second half.
Williams: Incredibly big
for a 19 year old and a good tackler. He
was assured in possession, but dwelt on the ball for too long at times. He looked a little uncomfortable when
receiving the ball in tight situations at the back. He will improve rapidly as he adjusts to the
pace of first team, competitive football. I expect him to blossom at Swindon. His lack of pace means that he is suited to the centre. He will probably be used as a centre back and
central midfielder this season like Jack Stephens.
Robert: Good on the ball
and creates space for others, but was largely peripheral. He will not offer much defensively. He was the least impressive of the new
Swindon signings and I’m glad that the Club only offered him a one year deal. His best position is as a number 10 as he
doesn’t have much pace. I’ll give him
ten games before I make a definitive judgement.
Stewart: I was very
impressed. Very athletic and physically
stronger than I was expecting. A much
needed replacement for Louis Thompson, offering athleticism and dynamism in
midfield and protection on the counter-attack. Like all Swindon signings he is technically proficient. Already, he is one of Swindon’s most
important players.
Ormonde-Ottewill: Looked
more comfortable in the second half in a more advanced role. Technically assured, quick, with a cultured
left foot. A good signing.
Byrne: magnificent in the
free role. I think Cooper would have
liked to have played him in this role more last season were it not for the
plethora of attacking central midfielders Swindon had last season. Unfortunately, he did a little too well and
will probably be sold before the end of the transfer window.
Obika: Linked up play
well and is vital to Swindon’s prospects this season as the only number 9 type
striker with the seemingly impending departure of Michael Smith. His first touch for his goal was
exquisite. I think he is of Championship
calibre.